Pages

Thursday, March 21, 2019

2018 Draft Summary

Earlier this month, I posted a summary of draft results to date for 20 years, starting in 1998 and continuing through 2017. Now it's time to look at the early results of the 2018 draft class. (These summaries emanate from a much deeper team-by-team analysis that was rolled out earlier this year. Links to the team-by-team information can be found at the end of this post.)

This post is an attempt to summarize the initial results of the 2018 draft in order to get an idea as to how a particular draft class plays out over time. This is just the start of an ongoing analysis that will follow this draft class going forward, looking at both the success (or failure) of individual players and how those players may ultimately benefit the team that drafted them (even if the player never plays for the drafting team and that benefit comes in the form of trade value), the makeup of the class, the likelihood of making it to the majors and other such minutiae. I plan to revisit and update information on both the historical and newer draft classes in the next offseason and I'll just see where the data takes me. This project stems from my curiosity about the draft in general and my enjoyment in sorting through myriad pixels in order to ultimately access the bigger picture. (I know. I'm a little weird.)

GENERAL NOTES: Information was obtained from Baseball-Reference. The player position reflects the primary position at which the player actually played in 2018 (and not necessarily the position at which he was drafted).

2018 DRAFT RESULTS

1214 Drafted | 960 Signed (79.1%)
658 Pitchers Drafted | 510 Signed (77.5%)
556 Position Players Drafted | 450 Signed (80.9%)
805 College Players Drafted | 752 Signed (93.4%)
104 JC/CC Players Drafted | 67 Signed (64.4%)
305 HS/NS Players Drafted | 141 Signed (46.2%)
7 Players Released/Retired as of 12/31/18 (0.73% of Signed Players)

POSITION BREAKDOWN (Primary Position in 2018*)

391 RHP Signed: 322 C | 27 JC/CC | 42 HS/NS
119 LHP Signed: 96 C | 9 JC/CC | 14 HS/NS
84 C Signed: 60 C | 9 JC/CC | 15 HS
38 1B Signed: 34 C | 1 JC/CC | 3 HS
49 2B Signed: 44 C | 1 JC/CC | 4 HS
52 3B Signed: 40 C | 4 JC/CC | 8 HS
57 SS Signed: 35 C | 2 JC/CC | 20 HS
170 OF Signed: 121 C | 14 JC/CC | 35 HS

*Two additional OF and one additional 1B can be added to the position player totals to account for two-way players who are included in the pitcher totals.

2018 DRAFT OVERALL BY AFFILIATE (PITCHERS)

Overall: 3.67 ERA | 1.299 WHIP
376.2 Avg IP Per Affiliate
25 Avg IP Per Active Pitcher

59 Pitchers did not pitch in 2018 (44 C, 5 JC/CC, 10 HS)

Lowest WHIP
Indians: 2.41 ERA | 1.138 WHIP | 336.2 IP | 14 Active Pitchers
Blue Jays: 3.22 ERA | 1.149 WHIP | 389 IP | 17 Active Pitchers
Rays: 3.07 ERA | 1.179 WHIP | 563.1 IP | 20 Active Pitchers
Rangers: 3.27 ERA | 1.201 WHIP | 170.2 IP | 9 Active Pitchers
Astros: 2.74 ERA | 1.207 WHIP | 364.2 IP | 16 Active Pitchers

Highest WHIP
Orioles: 3.97 ERA | 1.449 WHIP | 330.2 IP | 16 Active Pitchers
Braves: 3.98 ERA | 1.431 WHIP | 348.2 IP | 17 Active Pitchers
Angels: 4.63 ERA | 1.399 WHIP | 281.2 IP | 12 Active Pitchers
Reds: 4.73 ERA | 1.396 WHIP | 467.2 IP | 16 Active Pitchers
Seattle: 4.44 ERA | 1.378 WHIP | 316.1 IP | 15 Active Pitchers

Highest Average Innings Pitched
Cardinals: 36.1 IP | 17 Active Pitchers
White Sox: 35 IP | 15 Active Pitchers
Tigers: 33.1 IP | 15 Active Pitchers
Royals: 30.1 IP | 18 Active Pitchers
Pirates: 29.2 IP | 16 Active Pitchers
Reds: 29.1 IP | 16 Active Pitchers

Lowest Average Innings Pitched
Mets: 16.1 IP | 15 Active Pitchers
Yankees: 18.2 IP | 16 Active Pitchers
Rangers: 19 IP | 9 Active Pitchers
Cubs: 19.1 IP | 13 Active Pitchers
Marlins: 19.1 IP | 17 Active Pitchers
Phillies: 19.2 IP | 15 Active Pitchers

Lowest Hits Per Nine Innings
Astros: 6.64 H/9 | 16 Active Pitchers
Blue Jays: 6.76 H/9 | 16 Active Pitchers
Mets: 7.12 H/9 | 15 Active Pitchers
Athletics: 7.23 H/9 | 14 Active Pitchers
Rangers: 7.38 H/9 | 9 Active Pitchers

Lowest Walks Per Nine Innings
Indians: 2.30 BB/9 | 14 Active Pitchers
Cardinals: 2.42 BB/9 | 17 Active Pitchers
Red Sox: 2.44 BB/9 | 13 Active Pitchers
White Sox: 2.68 BB/9 | 15 Active Pitchers
Tigers: 2.71 BB/9 | 15 Active Pitchers
Nationals: 2.74 BB/9 | 15 Active Pitchers

Highest Strikeouts Per Nine Innings
Indians: 11.63 SO/9 | 14 Active Pitchers
Angels: 11.22 SO/9 | 12 Active Pitchers
Padres: 11.08 SO/9 | 13 Active Pitchers
Mets: 10.85 SO/9 | 15 Active Pitchers
Yankees: 10.57 SO/9 | 16 Active Pitchers

2018 INDIVIDUAL DRAFT PICKS IN 2018 (PITCHERS)

Player's highest level played in 2018 noted*

Lowest WHIP (Minimum 30 IP)
LHP Michael Mediavilla (Brewers): 0.59 ERA | 0.626 WHIP | 30.1 IP | Rk
RHP Ryan Feltner (Rockies): 0.88 ERA | 0.652 WHIP | 30.2 IP | Rk
RHP Simon Rosemblum-Larson (Rays): 1.16 ERA | 0.724 WHIP | 38.2 IP | A
RHP Connor Coward (Cardinals): 0.88 ERA | 0.732 WHIP | 41 IP | Rk
RHP Michael Baird (Cardinals): 1.61 ERA | 0.739 WHIP | 44.2 IP | SSA
RHP Ethan DeCaster (Tigers): 0.84 ERA | 0.781 WHIP | 32 IP | A+
RHP James McArthur (Phillies): 0.54 ERA | 0.810 WHIP | 33.1 IP | A
RHP Gus Varland (Athletics): 0.95 ERA | 0.816 WHIP | 38 IP | A
RHP Brett Daniels (Astros): 1.62 ERA | 0.840 WHIP | 33.1 IP | SSA
LHP Drew Rom (Orioles): 1.76 ERA | 0.848 WHIP | 30.2 IP | Rk

Lowest Hits Per Nine Innings (Minimum 30 IP)
RHP Cole Uvila (Rangers): 3.69 H/9 | 31.2 IP | SSA
RHP Austin Hansen (Astros): 4.11 H/9 | 30.2 IP | SSA
LHP Michael Mediavilla (Brewers): 4.15 H/9 | 30.1 IP | Rk
RHP James McArthur (Phillies): 4.32 H/9 | 33.1 IP | A
RHP Simon Rosenblum-Larson (Rays): 4.42 H/9 | 38.2 IP | A
RHP Ryan Feltner (Rockies): 4.70 H/9 | 30.2 IP | Rk
RHP Josiah Gray (Reds/Traded to Dodgers): 4.99 H/9 | 52.1 IP | Rk
RHP Connor Coward (Cardinals): 5.05 H/9 | 41 IP | Rk
RHP Joey Pulido (Blue Jays): 5.15 H/9 | 36.2 IP | SSA
LHP Will Tribucher (Rockies): 5.23 H/9 | 31 IP | Rk

Highest Strikeouts Per Nine Innings (Minimum 30 IP)
RHP Kyler Stout (D'Backs): 14.75 SO/9 | 32.1 IP | A
LHP Clayton Andrews (Brewers): 14.73 SO/9 | 33 IP | A
RHP Simon Rosemblum-Larson (Rays): 14.43 SO/9 | 38.2 | A
RHP Austin Ross (Phillies): 14.01 SO/9 | 35.1 | SSA
LHP Austin Cox (Royals): 13.77 SO/9 | 33.1 | Rk
RHP Cole Uvila (Rangers): 13.64 SO/9 | 31.2 IP | SSA
LHP Eli Lingos (Indians): 13.22 SO/9 | 32 IP | SSA
RHP Austin Hansen (Astros): 13.21 SO/9 | 30.2 IP | SSA
RHP Perry DellaValle (Cardinals): 13.20 SO/9 | 45.2 IP | Rk
RHP Daniel Bies (Yankees): 12.90 SO/9 | 30 IP | SSA

*Notes on players include the highest level achieved for the 2018 season using the following abbreviations:
Rk = Rookie
SSA = Short Season A
A = Full Season A
A+ = Full Season A Advanced

2018 DRAFT PICKS IN 2018 (POSITION PLAYERS)

Overall: .261/.349/.386/.735 batting line

8 Position Players did not play in 2018 (6 C, 2 HS)

High OPS
Rockies: .291/.371/.479/.850 | 14 Active Players
D'Backs: .288/.374/.440/.815 | 11 Active Players
Dodgers: .275/.367/.433/.800 | 19 Active Players
Twins: .281/.366/.427/.793 | 16 Active Players
Indians: .276/.373/.409/.783 | 14 Active Players
Royals: .282/.364/.412/.776 | 13 Active Players

Low OPS
Orioles: .219/.298/.322/.619 | 14 Active Players
Angels: .239/.317/.350/.667 | 9 Active Players
Cubs: .251/.333/.337/.670 | 15 Active Players
Athletics: .243/.339/.343/.682 | 18 Active Players
Astros: .232/.324/.362/.686 | 14 Active Players
Rangers: .253/.339/.347/.686 | 11 Active Players

2018 INDIVIDUAL DRAFT PICKS IN 2018 (POSITION PLAYERS)

Player's highest level played in 2018 noted*

High Individual Average (Minimum 200 PA)
OF Cal Stevenson (Blue Jays): .369/.511/.523/1.034 | Rk
OF Jarren Duran (Red Sox): .357/.394/.516/.910 | A
1B Zach Shannon (D'Backs): .354/.439/.677/1.116 | Rk
OF Nathan Eaton (Royals): .354/.427/.581/1.008 | Rk
3B C.J. Alexander (Braves): .352/.429/.495/.924 | A+
1B Grant Lavigne (Rockies): .350/.477/.519/.996 | Rk
C Ryan Jeffers (Twins): .344/.444/.502/.946 | A
3B Bobby Honeyman (Mariners): .336/.370/.460/.830 | A+
SS Owen Miller (Padres): .336/.386/.460/.846 | A
2B Coco Montes (Rockies): .333/.413/.513/.926 | Rk
OF Alek Thomas (D'Backs): .333/.395/.463/.858 | Rk

High Individual OPS (Minimum 200 PA)
1B Zach Shannon (D'Backs): .354/.439/.677/1.116 | Rk
OF Cal Stevenson (Blue Jays): .369/.511/.523/1.034 | Rk
OF Jonah Davis (Pirates): .306/.398/.612/1.010 | Rk
OF Nathan Eaton (Royals): .354/.427/.581/1.008 | Rk
1B Grant Lavigne (Rockies): .350/.477/.519/.996 | Rk
OF Jordan Qsar (Rays): .289/.422/.573/.996 | SSA
OF Niko Hulsizer (Dodgers): .281/.426/.531/.957 | Rk
SS Blaze Alexander (D'Backs): .329/.417/.538/.955 | Rk
OF Matt Cogen (Dodgers): .313/.403/.550/.953 | A
C Joey Bart (Giants): .294/.364/.588/.952 | SSA

High Individual Runs Scored
OF Cal Stevenson (Blue Jays): 73 R | 59 G | Rk
OF Nathan Eaton (Royals): 59 R | 66 G | Rk
OF Will Golsan (Rockies): 58 R | 63 G | Rk
OF Kyle Isbel (Royals): 57 R | 64 G | A
OF Niko Decolati (Rockies): 55 R | 69 G | Rk
2B Coco Montes (Rockies): 55 R | 69 G | Rk

High Individual Doubles
3B David Villar (Giants): 23 2B | 62 G | SSA
OF Kyle Isbel (Royals): 22 2B | 64 G | A
OF Nathan Eaton (Royals): 20 2B | 66 G | Rk
1B Nick Gatewood (Padres): 20 2B | 60 G | SSA
1B Dillon Paulson (Dodgers): 20 2B | 58 G | Rk

High Individual Triples
OF Nathan Eaton (Royals): 12 3B | 66 G | Rk
OF Ross Adolph (Mets/Traded to Astros): 12 3B | 61 G | SSA
OF Jarren Duran (Red Sox): 11 3B | 67 G | A
OF Justin Dean (Braves): 9 3B | 60 G | A

High Individual Home Runs
3B Nolan Gorman (Cardinals): 17 HR | 63 G | A
OF Keegan McGovern (Mariners): 15 HR | 69 G | A
1B Chris Williams (Twins): 15 HR | 62 G | Rk
OF Jordan Qsar (Rays): 14 HR | 62 G | SSA
1B Zach Shannon (D'Backs): 14 HR | 54 G | Rk

High Individual RBI
1B Dillon Paulson (Dodgers): 61 RBI | 58 G | Rk
OF Drew Mount (Reds): 58 RBI | 65 G | Rk
C David Fry (Brewers): 57 RBI | 63 G | A
OF Niko Decolati (Rockies): 56 RBI | 69 G | Rk
1B Zach Shannon (D'Backs): 55 RBI | 54 G | Rk

High Individual Stolen Bases
OF Danny Amaral (Pirates): 25 SB | 58 G | SSA
OF Jarren Duran (Red Sox): 24 SB | 67 G | A
OF Kyle Isbel (Royals): 24 SB | 64 G | A
SS Frainyer Chavez (Rangers): 23 SB | 45 G | Rk
OF Adrian Ramos (Blue Jays): 23 SB | 44 G | Rk

High Individual Walks
OF Cal Stevenson (Blue Jays): 64 BB | 59 G | Rk
OF Jordan Qsar (Rays): 50 BB | 62 G | SSA
OF Chandler Taylor (Astros): 46 BB | 63 G | A
1B Grant Lavigne (Rockies): 45 BB | 59 G | Rk
OF Cade Harris (Rockies): 43 BB | 59 G | SSA

*Notes on players include the highest level achieved for the 2018 season using the following abbreviations:
Rk = Rookie
SSA = Short Season A
A = Full Season A
A+ = Full Season A Advanced

OVERVIEW

I'm not going to rank the affiliates as to the strength of their draft classes (to this point) because, with so many variables, comparing one system to another can often be the equivalent of comparing apples and kumquats. But there were still a few systems that stood out to me in terms of early results, depth, short-term potential, longer-term potential or a combination of all of those factors. And, although there were several franchises who stood out for pitching, but not position players (or vice versa), these are the ones that impressed me early by showing strength in both areas. (These are in no particular order.)

DIAMONDBACKS
There aren't any projected superstars among the Diamondbacks 2018 pitching class, but their overall initial results up and down the pecking order was suggestive of very good depth from their pitching ranks. And with all but one pitcher having been drafted out of college, this group could start factoring into the Diamondbacks plans in a couple of years. Balancing that out are a trio of Top 10 prospects on the position player front (two high school signees) who got off to great starts in their pro careers (plus an intriguing 15th rounder). Based on initial results, you could see a star or two emerge from the group.

RAYS
Based on initial results, the Rays look to have good depth with both pitching and offense as players throughout the draft impressed me with their inaugural seasons. As both groups were college-heavy, it won't take too long to see how much help this draft class will be able to offer the Rays at the major league level. On top of that, you can add a Top 100 high school lefty with potential star power (Matthew Liberatore) who got off to an excellent start. This could ultimately prove to be a very strong group.

PHILLIES
I really like the depth of the Phillies 2018 pitching draft class, particularly with the good mix of college, juco and high school players performing well at a variety of levels. And with college 3B Alec Bohm leading the way as the Phillies top prospect (and #59 overall in the top 100), most position players performed as well or better than expected in their first seasons.

TIGERS
Again, depth is the key with the Tigers as they went for both quality and quantity in 2018, signing 38 of 40 picks (and all of their top 37 picks). Their pitching was particularly strong with the Tigers top prospect overall RHP Casey Mize (ranked #2 RHP prospect as well) handling himself well against the early challenge to High A competition and strong results throughout the class, including the 35th and 36th round picks. The Tigers were very aggressive in promoting several of their position players and a number of them responded well to the challenge. This early exposure to higher competition could move up the timetable for some of these players to help out in Detroit sooner rather than later.

INDIANS
On the flip side of the coin, I am probably more intrigued by the long-term potential of Cleveland's 2018 draft class than I am by any more immediate success. With that said, there were a number of college-drafted pitchers who performed very nicely in 2018 and were promoted to full season teams as a result. But their top two high school pitching picks (currently #9 and #12 prospects in the system) could ultimately help write the story of how successful this draft class will prove to be. In addition, there are a few high school and juco players on the position player side that could portend longer-term success, particularly Cleveland's #4 prospect C Bo Naylor. This draft class will take a little longer to come into focus, but has the potential to generate a star or two.

RANGERS (WILD CARD)
In my mind, the Rangers 2018 draft class is the most uncertain of all in outcome, but should be extremely interesting to watch play out. The Rangers drafted heavily among high school and juco players and currently have four high schoolers numbering in their Top 30 prospect list, including their #3 prospect RHP Cole Winn (who also resides on MLB Pipeline's Top 100 list). A total of 11 of their 31 signed draft picks (including 10 of their pitchers) did not play in 2018 so there's not much of a track record to go by at this point. This draft class could be boom or bust, but in any event, it will likely take a while for it to all play out.

I singled out the above teams because I found the draft classes to have the most potential in both pitching and offense, but there are a number of teams that showed very strongly in one area or the other, but not necessarily in both.

On the pitching side, the Pirates college-heavy 2018 draft class has a number of pitchers who could move quickly through the system. The Blue Jays and Astros both showed good depth with a number of lower round pitchers performing nicely in their inaugural seasons. The Royals had mixed results, but with a whopping six pitching prospects in their Top 30 prospects (and four of those in the Top 10), I certainly expect more from some of these prospects moving forward even if they may have underperformed initially.

On the position player side, the Braves, Cardinals and Dodgers were all very aggressive in promoting players and those players responded well. The Marlins, Brewers and Angels, with so many younger players, may be slower to promote players, but will have a lot of high risk/high reward long-term potential. The Rockies had excellent initial results throughout their 2018 draft class. Boston has a good mix of highly touted high school prospects and college players with very good early success; the Yankees group has a similar mix but more uneven initial results. Even with the (apparent) defection of Kyler Murray to football, the top of the Athletics draft class is impressive (although the lower depth may be a bit questionable). On the other hand, I like the depth of the Mariners class and can see a number of their college-drafted players make fast work of the minors.

Other 2018 draft classes will likely achieve success ultimately, but the initial results may have been less than stellar. And there will certainly be individual players who have the chance to be stars who will emerge from draft classes that boast little else of lasting impact. The story of the 2018 draft is really just starting to be written. Stay tuned ...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.